- About   -   Contact   -   Links   -   Tools   -   Archive   -   Film -


 

Friday, February 3, 2012

For the sake of not having to write the same intro a million different ways throughout the rest of time, just know that this column avoids the overly long and sometimes dull process of full film reviews and instead opts to break things down based on what I thought going in, what happened while I was there and what I learned at the end of it all.  Thanks for reading!




The Breakdown - The Woman In Black

The Impression:

Mr. Harry Potter, Daniel Radcliffe’s first foray in to the world of non-Hogwart’s related cinema. It’s produced the rekindled Hammer films and the trailers impress a haunted house story set in the countryside of Victorian Britain. All of these things sound good to me. But I warn you, it is February and there’s a reason studios torpedo films in to the murky water of these godforsaken winter months.



The Reality:

For most of its running time, The Woman In Black is a creepy, well-shot haunted house flick that never tries to be anything else. Daniel Radcliffe plays Arthur Kipps a widower, and failing lawyer sent to the barren, coastal marshes of Britain to help put to rest the paperwork of a deceased client. The town attempts to expel him at all cost, the house is daunting mess of spookiness, and then there’s the whole thing about children mysteriously dying at the hands of the titular Woman In Black - this movie genuinely scared me. There was a moment near the end, a sustained moment of fright you might call it, where my body shook in a way that it has never done before. Not like I was going to wet myself out of fear or have a heart attack, just a long drawn out shudder caused by a frightful revulsion of which I’ve never felt. The film stumbles narrative-wise two-thirds of the way through and I thought it would derail the film for me, but it recovers and its impressively morose and creepy imagery kept me tied to my seat. For those looking to lambaste Radcliffe for his lack of thespian ability, leave your coat at the door, Radcliffe handles himself admirably, perhaps not fully shaking himself clean of the lingering Potter impression, but nonetheless imbuing his character with a convincing sense of desperate dread.


The Lesson:

The Woman In Black has me curious as to what both Mr. Radcliffe (I think it’s time to drop the Potter nicknames, there will actually never be another one again) and Hammer Films are planning next.



- -




Friday, February 3, 2012

For the sake of not having to write the same intro a million different ways throughout the rest of time, just know that this column avoids the overly long and sometimes dull process of full film reviews and instead opts to break things down based on what I thought going in, what happened while I was there and what I learned at the end of it all.  Thanks for reading!




The Breakdown - The Innkeepers

The Impression:

Ti West this, Ti West that - this horror director made a big impression with The House Of The Devil (a film I never saw) and his follow up is supposed to be a smart, funny bit of fright.



The Reality:

I never figured out what Ti West was trying to do in The Innkeepers. It’s obviously a horror picture - a seemingly straightforward haunted house story about two employees of a haunted hotel on its last weekend of existence - but for some reason I just expected more. I don’t know if it was the hype behind the film or that it was so basic in its execution and its concept that I imagined West was aiming for something more metatextual but the film just seemed stagnant to me. Sara Paxton is good, if not a little too quirky, as Claire, the female lead determined to discover evidence that a ghost haunts the Yankee Pedlar Inn, but she doesn’t have a lot to do but wander to and fro through the hotel screaming at things that scare her. It’s a film that made me think that perhaps I’d nodded off, or that I’d missed something while distracted, as it ended with an air of "ohhhhhh, I see" but with no recognizable payoff. I almost wanted the film to drop the whole ghost schtick, to just focus on the two main characters and the hotel. Those were interesting, the ghost B plot seemed a little forced.


The Lesson:

I need to check out Ti West’s other stuff to see what my thoughts are. This isn’t really a lesson, more just a description of what I’m going to do after this.



- -




Friday, February 3, 2012

For the sake of not having to write the same intro a million different ways throughout the rest of time, just know that this column avoids the overly long and sometimes dull process of full film reviews and instead opts to break things down based on what I thought going in, what happened while I was there and what I learned at the end of it all.  Thanks for reading!




The Breakdown - Chronicle

The Impression:

A found footage film mated with a superhero film? Could be interesting. More interesting is the huge studio interest in Josh Trank post-Chronicle. Not to say that studio interest means anything anymore, but, it might mean good things.



The Reality:

The first twenty-five minutes of Chronicle are what you need to get through if you want to enjoy the rest of the movie. It’s the set-up of the film, three teenagers (one dork, one jock, one former-popular kid) find a strange meteor in the ground and it gives them, well, powers to do things. Powers that if they use too much cause headaches and nosebleeds. Powers that are getting stronger each and every day. For the first twenty minutes, maybe even thirty or forty minutes, the three kids act incredibly annoying (say stupid shit, do even stupider shit, listen to shitty music), then get powers and proceed to act equally annoying but with a bevy of classic superhero powers (strength, flight, telekinesis) to add to their ability to annoy. I thought perhaps this film would just annoy me, but the realization struck me that this film, and these good actors, were portraying high schoolers completely straight. High school kids are obnoxious (I’ve been one) and if granted powers instead of instantaneously becoming honorable crime fighting super heroes, they’d probably pull some stupid pranks and abuse their abilities. Once you’ve settled in to Trask’s remarkably accurate portrayal of this age range the rest of the movie is actually pretty strong, if not predictable. Kids get stronger and stronger, the nerdy kid (yet the strongest with his powers) goes a little bit off the deep end and a whole hell of a lot of bad stuff happens. Trask makes the found footage stuff work though, using the obnoxious constant presence of cellphone cameras and iPad cameras and film-related technology to give us a wide berth of angles and perspectives. It’s stylish and surprisingly sleek, and after the film ended the dark cloud of annoying teenage angst had vanished and I found myself uniformly happy with the way the film had ended.


The Lesson:

Teenagers are annoying. Give them superpowers and they’re downright unbearable. Unless they’re beating up police, destroying shit, and punching each other through buildings. Then, then they’re okay.



- -




Tuesday, January 31, 2012

For the sake of not having to write the same intro a million different ways throughout the rest of time, just know that this column avoids the overly long and sometimes dull process of full film reviews and instead opts to break things down based on what I thought going in, what happened while I was there and what I learned at the end of it all.  Hope that's OK.

Read on!




The Breakdown - The Woman In Black

The Impression:

Daniel Radcliffe breaks away from the Harry Potter series and gets ready to start the second part of his career.  First up, an adaptation of The Woman In Black, a novel from 1983 that has been previously been featured on the stage and in the form of TV movie.  This is going to be good.



The Reality:

Unfortunately, The Woman In Black is not a good movie.  I wish I could just call it a mess and leave it at that, but it's not as though it's a wreck in every aspect.  It certainly looks nice and features some solid performances.  The problem with it, though, is that there's no real story.  The film plays out like someone read the book and then just wanted to see their favorite parts on the big screen.  Is that writer Jane Goldman's fault, or did director James Watkins just cut out all of the exposition?  I have no clue, but I do know the film greatly suffers from an extreme lack of information.  I spent a rather large portion of the movie feeling bored and curious as to when the cheap jump scares would stop and an actual story would begin.  I mean, at least give me a good twist!


The Lesson:

A mediocre film can be just as disappointing as a terrible one.



- -




Tuesday, January 31, 2012

For the sake of not having to write the same intro a million different ways throughout the rest of time, just know that this column avoids the overly long and sometimes dull process of full film reviews and instead opts to break things down based on what I thought going in, what happened while I was there and what I learned at the end of it all.  Thanks for reading!




The Breakdown - Man On A Ledge

The Impression:

Sam Worthington has quickly become a sign to me that the film at hand is going to be half-assed at best, awful at worst. Man On A Ledge (the worst title in years) seems like a pretty half-baked idea and the trailers give away the big reveal. Also it’s January, where everything is awful.



The Reality:

January tests me every year. There’s nothing exceptional that ever breaks the seal in the inaugural month, thus every film I’m seeing will either be bad enough to leave scars or just mediocre enough to leave me angry at the state of film. Man On The Ledge is certainly the latter, the story of a disgraced cop (Sam Worthington) out for revenge, who takes to extreme measures to orchestrate a truly stupid heist. I wasn’t angry after seeing it or offended, I was just, well, nothing. Asger Leth just sort of slaps together a movie that is sort of about a man on a ledge, and sort of about a heist, and sort of about family dynamics and sort of about, well, seriously who gives a shit? This isn’t a movie I recommend in any way and even though it features a cast that includes Anthony Mackie, Elisabeth Banks (awful in this film by the way, stiff and poorly cast as a hard-nosed, alcoholic detective on the mend), Ed Harris none of their considerable talent can drag this film from the pond scum of mediocrity. Just avoid it.


The Lesson:

January is a terrible month for films. I always try to think it might be different and it never, ever is.



- -




Saturday, January 28, 2012

Time for your weekly notable news update!  Below you'll find a slew of sentences meant to provide a brief glimpse of what's been going on over the past week in movieland.  If something leaves you desperate for more info then my advice is to do a little extra research on one or all of the following fantastic sites:  Latino Review, Dark Horizons, Ain't It Cool News, CHUD and/or JoBlo.  Now, read on!


Max Landis (Chronicle) has been hired by Disney to write a space adventure.  Max is the son of John Landis.

Hailee Steinfeld (True Grit) and Paul Giamatti have signed on for a new version of Romeo And Juliet.

Steven Spielberg is expected to sign on to direct Moses for Warner Bros.  The movie is being described as a Braveheart-like version of Moses' life.

Russell Brand will star in The Haunterpreneur.  The film is said to be about a man who creates a haunted house in order to bring a town together.

Sarah Jessica Parker has replaced Demi Moore in Lovelace.  Moore had to drop out because of personal issues.

The Hangover 3 is definitely happening, and each of the three stars of the previous two films are getting $15 million each to reprise their roles.

Catherine Zeta-Jones has reportedly signed on to star in Steven Soderbergh's Side Effects.  The film is said to center around a doctor who is addicted to prescription drugs.

The Crow remake that was dead is now alive.  F. Javier Gutierrez (Before The Fall) will direct.  No word yet on who will star in it.

Liam Hemsworth (Hunger Games) will star in Timeless, which is about a man who builds a time machine so that he can see his now dead wife once more.

Darren Aronofsky's Noah is expected to begin filming this summer.  Michael Fassbender is said to be interested in the starring role that Christian Bale passed on.

Paul Reubens has reportedly signed on to play a film critic in Charlie Kaufman's upcoming Frank Or Francis.

John Lee Hancock (The Blind Side) will direct the adaptation of John Grisham's The Partner.



This Week's Notable Trailers:












- -




Friday, January 20, 2012

For the sake of not having to write the same intro a million different ways throughout the rest of time, just know that this column avoids the overly long and sometimes dull process of full film reviews and instead opts to break things down based on what I thought going in, what happened while I was there and what I learned at the end of it all.  Thanks for reading!




The Breakdown - Haywire

The Impression:

Steven Soderbergh is like any great auteur, a consummate genre-jumper. Happy to dip his feet in crime, or comedy, or infection thriller just to use his immense skills to meld it to his own form. Haywire, Soderbergh’s collaboration with MMA fighter Gina Carano is his foray in to straight up action. Paired with Lem Dobbs, his writing cohort on the amazing The Limey, Soderbergh seems set for another shot out of the park.



The Reality:

I was stunned at how boring Haywire is. People would assume that casting an MMA fighter is akin to casting a wooden block that can kick and punch, but it isn’t Gina Carano’s acting that stimies the film. Soderbergh, working as his own DP, crafts a film that hints at a peppy action/spy caper, but is dragged in to lip-dragging boredom by it’s cement-booted pace. Gina Carano plays a super secret agent on her way out of the system but dragged back in after a mission goes bad. It sounds like the plot of a 90s cable action movie (especially with the, er, well endowed MMA star kicking ass at its helm) and Peter Andrews (Soderbergh’s pseudonym) frames the movie thusly. Grainy color palettes, digital zooms, poorly composed shots - it seems like some sort of faulty mix of Soderberg’s early more indie work and the recent big budget adventures like Ocean’s 11. I imagined the story itself, though generic in concept, would zing under the auspices of two talented men like Soderbergh and Dobbs, but it’s one note with no aspirations to evolve. Carano is hunted and in turn hunts down a series of bad guys (all men) whom she promptly puts in there place with a series of truly jarring moves. Perhaps Soderbergh was attempting to create a third-wave feminist film, but instead he glues a bunch of, admittedly, awesome fight scenes on to a made-for-television script. The moments with Michael Fassbender (playing an Irish spy) are almost sexy, and his eventual beat-down is the best in the film. Carano herself is actually quite charming, though robotic at times, and I found myself more and more attracted to her as the film continued. Maybe next time she’ll actually be in something I can get down with.


The Lesson:

Those who jump genres, don’t always jump correctly.



- -




Friday, January 13, 2012

To be frank, 2011 wasn’t my favorite year in film. Oh I saw films I loved, and certainly saw films I hated, but sitting here staring at the screen, trying to organize a list of ten films I really loved, hasn’t been as easy as it was in years prior. I’m going to chalk this up to a few things:

1. I’m going to put 2011 on record as the first year I really went at as a "film critic." I plugged in to the vast network of film screenings in the Bay Area and for an extended period of time saw everything, everything, I could. This is quite possibly the biggest of rookie mistakes a film critic can make as throwing yourself in to every film (especially when you’re charming editor allows you to write about anything) will burn you out - quickly. It’s quite possible that my lackluster reaction to some of the big pictures of the year was due to my film-loving soul being dragged across the barnacles of shit film for a concentrated period. It’s hard to see out of the cynic fog when you’re using it as a life-saving shield.

2. I just wasn’t that impressed with film this year. Seriously. It felt like the big pictures of the summer were mediocre, the nerd-films of the year didn’t sit terribly well with me, and even the new pictures from the big guns seemed, well, pretty eh. There were certainly films that stood out, but they weren’t standing that far out, if you know what I mean. I’ll say this, Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows almost made my list this year. And not to say that the movie isn’t great, but on any other year it would’ve topped the list of popcorn favs, but never seen even the bottom rungs of the best of ladder. It was just that kind of year.

That said, these are the ones that struck me hard enough to reverberate on through to this Top 10 list. Thanks for a great year, and as always, thanks for reading.




Noah's Top Films of 2011

10. Moneyball, d. Bennet Miller

I think Bennet Miller’s Capote is a stellar, chilling film and I’ve been waiting fairly eagerly for a follow-up. I think Michael Lewis' Moneyball is a great book, if not one better suited for MLB stat nerds than the general public. I thought Soderbergh would’ve done something magical with the strangeness of the book, and when he bailed the project seemed dead in the water. Even with the addition of Bennet Miller, I was skeptical. How does one change this book in to a film? Someone should ask Bennet Miller 'cause he, sigh, knocked it out of the park. Brad Pitt’s Billy Beane is such a beautifully sad character, a man obsessed with turning over the traditions of baseball, but unable to even approach his own personal life. Miller uses the world of baseball as a haunting stage to showcase Beane’s rise and fall and rise again. Pitt does career work here, allowing his star shine to exist underneath a thick cloud of earned sadness, his shaggy good looks perfectly fitting a failed baseball star turned revolutionary owner.

9. The Skin I Live In, d. Pedro Almodovar

I don’t know a lot about Almodovar. I’m a late convert to his genius and am still trying to find time to catch up with his earlier beloved films. Regardless, The Skin I Live In is a brilliant movie. I won’t saying anything about what happens, just know that it’s horror as only a true cinematic master can create. Almodovar has always been truly genius at making even the strangest of character choices seem enjoyable (the small man who climbs in the vagina in Talk To Her?) and he puts that to good use here. His reunion with Antonio Banderas reminds why Banderas was so famous in the first place, his brilliant plastic surgeon, a seemingly cold, heartless bastard slowly revealed to be much, much more.

8. Ides of March, d. George Clooney

I’m a sucker for 70s political thrillers, and George Clooney has outdone himself in paying homage to them. Based on the play Farrugat North, Clooney tells a familiar tale of political corruption amongs the left-wing idealist community and though it doesn’t address any shocking new issues, it’s such a solidly told tale that you can forget about it’s timeliness or originality. That and it’s the best cast film of the year. Philip Seymour Hoffman, Paul Giamatti, George Clooney, Ryan Gosling (with only standout performances this year), Marisa Tomei, Evan Rachel Woods - every actor really pulling out the A-game to make a truly ensemble film shine. After Leatherheads I was worried that Clooney might not actually have it in him. Those thoughts have been dispelled.

7. Hanna, d. Joe Wright

Joe Wright’s Atonement is a stellar film based on a solid book that I thought was completely inadaptable. The man obviously has talent but to say I was skeptical of his foray in to action is, well, an understatement. And as always, I was so very wrong. Hanna is the action movie that every other action movie should aspire to. Veering sharply from traditional American blockbusters, Hanna tells the tale of a little girl trained to be a killer with one simple task - eliminate a woman she’s never seen. Wright makes a film that banks heavily on the work of Jean-Luc Godard and the French New Wave, a beautiful edited, highly symbolic film about a little girl learning what it’s like to be human. Every shot, every character, every plot twist is spot on - especially the anti-climactic final scene. Eric Bana, an actor I worry about, does sharp work here as the father of Hanna, with Saoirse Ronan continuing her ascent as the new Dakota Fanning. No one is as good as Jessica Barden (the little girl Sophie), a bubbling pit of modern kid-values thrust in to the strange world of gay killers and violence Hanna accidentally drags her in to.

6. Drive, d. Nicolas Winding Refn

C’mon, this film was amazing! Great soundtrack, great cool-guy performance by Ryan Gosling, and dedication to tone and concept by Nicolas Winding Refn we rarely see these days in Hollywood films. People complained about the violence, but Winding Refn uses it as a threat, a shock, a reaction. It’s brutal and scary and unexpected - just the way violence is. Albert Brooks, all meat and perm, is a great gang boss with Ron Perlman his violence prone sidekick. Ryan Gosling has firmly cemented himself in my mind as the actor of his generation and between this and Ides of March I’ll watch anything the tinny-voiced stallion puts out.

5. Martha Marcy May Marlene, d. Sean Durkin

Turns out there’s a third Olsen sister who can totally act and this guy Sean Durkin threw her in to a real subtle film about cults and how scary they are and John Hawkes plays the cult leader and Elizabeth Olsen plays a girl who escapes the physical reality of it but can’t escape the mental clutches. It’s creepy and beautiful and has one of those endings where you spend the next few days looking over your shoulder saying, "What the fuck?" Hawkes has to be one of the great actors of his time because I’m almost positive if you met him in person he’d light your cigarette and talk about literature and be the nicest man alive, but in films like this he’s a total scary son-of-a-bitch who I wouldn’t let anywhere near my house. This movie made me breathless.

4: Bill Cunningham: New York, d. Richard Press

I don’t care if you know who renowned fashion photographer Bill Cunningham is. I don’t care if you don’t like fashion or photography or hell, even New York. Bill Cunningham: New York, a portrait of Bill Cunningham the New York Times’ resident on-the-street fashion photog is a both a touching portrait of a lonely old man who finds solace in his work and a sad portrait of the New York City that’s getting eaten away by big budget developers and the homogeneous bent of modernity. So unexpectedly brilliant.

3. The Artist, d. Michel Hazanavicius

I don’t like silent films - or I haven’t given myself the opportunity to like silent films. I’d heard good things about The Artist but really only went because it was being shown in the Dolby Film Labs, a theater I’d never gone to and one I assumed would have amazing sound and picture. It did, and even better The Artist blew me away. Hazanavicius' ode to silent films is, quite honestly, a love letter to movies as a whole. The film, almost entirely silent, tells the story of silent star George Valentin, a famed silent film actor, who’s washed away by the talkies and has to depend on the love of a dog and a woman to bring him back in to the spotlight. It’s traditional in its storytelling but is so heartfelt and beautifully put together that it scours a place in to your heart. Hazanavicius manages to make a truly meta-film about traditional filmmaking.

2. Beginners, d. Mike Mills

I was so entirely sad that I saw this film without anyone. Mike Mills Beginners is the touching semi-autobiographic story of his 70 year old father coming out of the closet in the brief years before he passed. It’s also about discovering love and realizing that there’s something else out there. It’s quirky and silly and just borders on the edge of overly-coy with subtitled dog talk and quick cuts and monotone voice-overs, but Mills wrangles it all in to a really touching piece about fathers and sons and how we move on. Ewan McGregor and Christopher Plummer are both stellar but are both thrust in to shadow by the jaw-dropping good looks of Melanie Laurent.

1. The Guard, d. John Michael McDonagh

The McDonagh family has to be weened on some truly amazing water, ‘cause these brothers are fucking talent monsters. Michael McDonagh’s In Bruges was my favorite film in 2008, and now The Guard is easily my favorite film of the year. It just seems like the Europeans know how to do action better (what with Hanna and Drive, reinventing the genre) and The Guard does it even better. Brendan Gleeson plays Sergeant Gerry Boyle, the type of back-woods police officer who spouts racist comments and generally doesn’t do dick. When a team of drug trafficking psychopaths start haranguing his small Irish seaside town, he has to team up with an FBI agent (Don Cheadle in striking form) to avert them. It’s a stark, cold movie, punctuated by blasts of black humor and the most entertaining performance of the year by Brendan Gleeson. McDonagh crafts a screenplay that tinkers with the traditional structure of the action film but imbues it with wit and intelligence and a shocking amount of heart. Absolutely fantastic film, quite handily the best of the year.


- -




Monday, January 9, 2012

And just like that, 2011 is gone.  I had made a goal to see at least 100 theatrical releases over the year, and I was able to do just that.  Below you'll find my 50 favorites, and a few other items.  Read on!




Top 50 Films of 2011


50)  The Innkeepers
49)  Paul
48)  The Squad
47)  El Narco
46)  Crazy Stupid Love
45)  Super
44)  Cedar Rapids
43)  Shame
42)  I Saw The Devil
41)  Shame
40)  Hugo
39)  Point Blank
38)  Captain America: The First Avenger
37)  Thor
36)  Puss In Boots 3D
35)  Fast Five
34)  Sherlock Holmes: A Game Of Shadows
33)  Win Win
32)  Rise Of The Planet Of The Apes
31)  The Descendants
30)  Take Shelter
29)  Rango
28)  Ip Man 2: Legend Of The Grandmaster
27)  Warrior
26)  Source Code
25)  Haunters
24)  Mission Impossible: Ghost Protocol
23)  Martha Marcy May Marlene
22)  Headhunters
21)  X-Men: First Class
20)  The Muppets
19)  Tree Of Life
18)  Super 8
17)  Melancholia
16)  Girl With The Dragon Tattoo
15)  Bridesmaids
14)  Attack The Block
13)  Tucker And Dale Vs Evil
12)  Juan Of The Dead
11)  The Artist


10)  The Guard

Whoever decided that Brendan Gleeson and Don Cheadle should be in a buddy comedy together is deserving of a huge round of applause. If you don't like films that play out as though they're smarter than you, then don't see this. Otherwise, I wish you good luck in not wanting to just watch this on repeat.

09)  50/50

A comedy about cancer? I honestly can't say I was 100% in when I sat down to see 50/50, but I gave it a shot because of the people involved, and I didn't end up disappointed. Joseph Gordon-Levitt is as impressive as he's ever been (which is saying something), and I think that even Seth Rogen may have done enough to rescind some of the backlash that swirled up after his sudden success.

08)  13 Assassins

This is just a cool flick. Takashi Miike could have done a lot of different things with this, but for whatever reason he decided to make the sort of classically-themed samurai movie that you want to pull out and watch anytime the word samurai is mentioned within 500 miles of you. The world needs more films like this.

07)  Hanna

While I fell in love with this twisted fairly tale story immediately, I did figure that by the end of the year I'd find something to push it out of the Top 10. Nope! As it turns out, the more I thought about Hanna, the more I found myself attached to it. Here's hoping Saorise Ronan keeps landing roles this good.

06)  Jeff, Who Lives At Home

I think the Duplass Brothers are overrated. They've done a few solid films. That's it. Nothing more. Jeff, Who Lives At Home, however, is so very good. Jason Segel and Ed Helms are both fantastic in it, and while it plays like a movie built on nothing but convenient plot devices, it packs so much heart that it's nearly impossible to not love it.

05)  The Skin I Live In

Pedro Almodovar is a brilliant director, and a master at making me want to squirm in my seat. This effort, which finally sees Antonio Banderas back in a respectable role, is probably the most squirm-worthy thing Almodovar has done in years, and there isn't a blip of it that won't keep your eyes glued to the screen. I can't wait to see on it on blu-ray.

04)  A Boy And His Samurai

I caught this family friendly effort at Fantastic Fest and loved it like you wouldn't believe. I don't know if it'll ever be released here in the US, but I beg that you try to seek it out. I promise you won't even remotely regret any effort that you put into finding a way to see it.

03)  Beginners

Quirky indie romances are a dime a dozen, but I'd be a liar if I didn't say this impressed me every moment it was on the screen in front of me. You could watch this for another great performance from Ewan McGregor, or some nice work from director Mike Mills, but I recommend a viewing just to see how lovely Melanie Laurent is. Why isn't she in more stuff?

02)  Drive

This is the big hype movie of the year. Ryan Gosling has done so much good work, and yet it's this little genre film that has seemingly broke him to the masses. In the world's defense, this is a great flick. It's beautifully shot, the soundtrack is as good as it gets, and Gosling really is an absolute gem in it. I don't know how much love it'll receive come award season, but I hope it takes home a few trophies.

01)  Midnight In Paris

I love Owen Wilson. He isn't always great, but when he is, he's as charming and lovable as anyone on the face of this planet. Yeah, Woody Allen wrote and directed a movie packed with literary references (some that flew way over my head) and great characters, but it was Mr. Wilson who made it all work. I knew this was my favorite movie of 2011 the moment I saw it, and I expect I'll continue thinking that even with repeat viewings.


5 Worst Films Of 2011
Cave Of Forgotten Dreams
Transformers: Dark Side Of The Moon
Freak Dance
Sucker Punch
Battle: Los Angeles


Most Disappointing Film Of 2011 - Harry Potter And The Deathly Hallows: Part II

I waited 10 years for an anti-climactic battle between the boy wonder wizard and the most evil dude of all time? No thanks. There could have at least been a dance number at the end.


Biggest Guilty Pleasure Of 2011 - New Kids Turbo

This movie is so dumb. Seriously. It will lower your IQ. Only watch it if you're drunk and know you'll be able to forget you ever saw it.


Favorite Documentary Of 2011 - Senna

It's beyond me how anyone could not love this documentary, which is masterfully crafted from a series of videos shot over the course of race car driver Aryton Senna's life. Just an impressive doc from beginning to end.


5 Films I Missed
Moneyball
We Need To Talk About Kevin
Contagion
Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy
A Separation


- -





Unless otherwise expressly stated, all text in this blog and any related pages, including the blog's archives, is licensed by John Laird under a Creative Commons License.